The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics implies that only particles with a wavelength smaller than that of the black hole itself could form a black hole. That means the range of potential wavelengths would be limited: it could not be infinite.
It therefore appears that the number of configurations that could form a black hole of a given mass, angular momentum and electric charge, although very large, may also be finite. Jacob Bekenstein suggested that from this finite number one could derive the entropy of a black hole. This would be a measure of the amount of information that was irretrievably lost during the collapse when a black hole was created.
The apparently fatal flaw in Bekenstein's suggestion was that if a black hole has a finite entropy that is proportional to the area of its event horizon, it also ought to have a finite temperature, which would be proportional to its surface gravity. This would imply that a respect to thermal radiation, at some temperature other than zero. Yet according to classical concepts, no such equilibrium is possible, since the black hole would absorb any thermal radiation that fell on it, but by definition would not be able to emit anything in return. It can't emit anything. it can't emit heat.
This is a paradox. And it's one to which I am going to return in my next lecture, when I'll be exploring how black holes challenge the most basic principle about the predictability of universe, and the certainty of history and asking what would happen if you ever got sucked into one.
No comments:
Post a Comment